Yes... I worked for a company that paid a photographer for some pictures that were used in a brochure. I ran into a problem when I wanted to utilize some of the pics on the company's web-site. The photographer told me I couldn't without paying him a second time for the pics, because the original agreement had some clause about using them only for our brochure. I was quite angry because the company paid him quite a bit for the pictures.Yeah Chuck had no problem with me using it. I did run into an issue with another photographer who took a picture on palomar that I bought and a local magazine used.
Yeah, it seems most (not all) professional photogs are snobs who view "amatures" with disdain and see the advance of modern photography as a threat to their way of life. Which it may be, but you can either tilt at windmills or adapt and thrive. The way carriage makers at the turn of the last century either adapted to horseless carriages or they went out of business. That's the way progress works. Adapt or die.Years ago (I'm talking film camera days) I did some photography for my cousins race team. I was a pit guy but would take my camera up to the spotters booth during test sessions. There was a track photographer who sold pics to the drivers so they could buy a bunch of them, sign them and give them to the kids coming through the pits. I took better pics and had a ton printed and we were giving them away. He flipped. Tried to get the track promoter to kick us out lol. That was his territory.
While it is polite to ask the photographer's permission for our T-shirts, since Jay basically redid them he'd have a "fair use" defense if it came down to it since Jay can easily show that he basically transformed the picture into an entirely different picture and for a different purpose. (Look at Shepard Fairey, the guy who did the Obama "Hope" poster, as an example of someone taken to court over a transformed picture used without prior permission. He should have had a slam dunk defense, but he was caught destroying evidence for no good reason, then lied about it. )Yeah Chuck had no problem with me using it. I did run into an issue with another photographer who took a picture on palomar that I bought and a local magazine used.
haha, yeah i have seen those guys. Trust me, im no pro either, just trying to make a few dollars here and there, i have been on both sides of the coin. On one hand trying to have fun taking photos, and getting stares from the pros, and on the other hand trying to do a job being paid, and having aunt sue coming up with her DSLR that she doesnt know how to turn the flash off of, trying to run the show and pose people. LOL its a tough thing to do. I look at it like a car mechanic. He has a business where he has alot of overhead and has to charge more for an oil change. He wouldnt want someone coming up and offering to do oil changes for $10 right outside. Sure is it cheaper? yes, but there is no overhead, so he can afford to be cheaper. Not only that, but when something breaks, the mechanics shop is still going to be there, what happened to the stranger in the parking lot? lolI agree. They need to make their money. The funny thing was that the track photographer was terrible! lol My uncle (who owned the team) told him so and told him if he could take a picture half as good as mine he'd be buying them from him, but his all sucked. Besides, we weren't selling the pics. My cousin would sign a dozen of them and spread them out over the hood of the car for the kids to come by and get. No profit in it for us. Were were weekend racers not doing it for a living. He was just bent that a 20 year old kid with a Canon Rebel took better pics than he did. lol
I want to, but I still haven't gotten a response on being able to use credit/debit through paypal like on etsy/amazon/newegg ...stupid spending limit on my paypal account...Come on people pull the trigger and order some shirts!!! Yeah, I'm calling out all the "guests" who surf this site too :thumbup: