Hello, I read in a Tech book on oil, that if the bike or car has been started once, the oil has been contaminated and needs to be changed as the oil becomes acidic destrying your seals, in six months , this is very bad in an engine.Need some advice guys and galz. Got an 09 FZ6R and it only has 270 miles on it due to me being military and always away. Finally I will be with it for good this spring. It has the same oil I brought it home with in March 2009. Should I still follow the manual and change it at 600 miles or just do it now? I went to a dealer and he said even though the oil has been sitting in the crank case for 2 years it is still good since there is only 270 miles on that oil. Should I trust his word and stay with that oil till 600 miles? I do have Castrol 4t 10W-40 and a K&N oil filter availble right now. Any advice would be appreciated.
as for engine break in dont lug it and dont hold at red line /when i had my v 1100 manual called for 20-40 dealer wanted to sell me 20-50 [cause thats all they had] they said yami changed recomendation lol . they sold suzuki branded oil with api rating S L which was to heavy for that bike [could tell it didnt like it] when i bought fz they said i should only use yamalube and not rotella because it was motorcycle oil so i told them rotella was jaso MA certified and he looked at me me funny and asked what that meant so i told him ok for bikes lol;;;Agreed. I read "Yamalube" as "any high quality motorcycle oil". The key is the high quality.
If this were true, the roads would be littered with new bikes with trashed engines. Consider that every brand new bike gets test run at the factory, then spends a month or more in transit, and then sits in a crate or on the dealer floor, sometimes for up to a year, or more.Hello, I read in a Tech book on oil, that if the bike or car has been started once, the oil has been contaminated and needs to be changed as the oil becomes acidic destrying your seals, in six months , this is very bad in an engine.
do not free load it in neutral,,,,load it either on the road or a dynoHi, i have a new 2009 FZ6r with 4 miles on it and ive heard alot about breaking it in. The manual says for the first 1000 miles avoid prolonged full throttle or red line . Then from 0 till 700 miles avoid prolonged operation above 5800rpm. Change oil and filter then avoid prolonged operation above 7000rpm.
I have read a method on here about pinning it with no load, 2500 to 7000 then decel 20 times. Next 4000 to red line till it stops smoking. I might have read that incorrectly and he had it on a dynojet in gear not nutreal but i cant find that post to ask him.
Its my experience that any load {bogging it} or prolonged operation at any rpm, is just wrong during break in. The same as the mechanic says on my new trucks. What happens that is bad?
On my new Suzuki {20 years ago} they said red line it but dont hold it and do that alot, for 600 miles wich wasnt easy because it did 80mph at redline in second gear.
Now engines are much more advanced and my dealer wont give a straight awnser, so I'm open on any and all opinions in this very important issue.
Thanks,
Road Rubber
Note: i have a two bros full exaust and a power comander V
That's what I've been doing!I can't really vote on this one. All of the above will be the right answer! I milk it under 6K for the first 300 miles, then I hit the double digit at full throttle in first gear few times but still kept it under 7K on normal driving until 600 miles.
i followed the manuals instruction per the breaking and now that i have passed 1000 miles i have been pleased with the results. problem is that i have no way of comparing the suggested break in with alternative break in methods. it sucked having to keep the rpm's low but it had to be done and now that im free it feels good. the bike preforms well and im happy with the decisions i made. nevertheless, who knows how it would have preformed if i did a different breaking in method. would i have gained more HP if i did? how much HP would i have gained? would i or anyone be able to notice the difference; who knows... the bike rides well and im very pleased with the resultsThink I'll follow the instructions given by the dealer, don't think you can go wrong that way. Not about to ruin my $6000 bike
I think you made the right choice. I believe that you would not have gained more horses. I believe if anything, had you gone above specifications and pushed the bike too much you may have created issues with the engine that may not be reversable and would have to get it fixed on/off warranty. Or possibly loss of torque/horsepower. But I'm not a pro so I'm just speculating. Hope you enjoy the F*** out of your ridei followed the manuals instruction per the breaking and now that i have passed 1000 miles i have been pleased with the results. problem is that i have no way of comparing the suggested break in with alternative break in methods. it sucked having to keep the rpm's low but it had to be done and now that im free it feels good. the bike preforms well and im happy with the decisions i made. nevertheless, who knows how it would have preformed if i did a different breaking in method. would i have gained more HP if i did? how much HP would i have gained? would i or anyone be able to notice the difference; who knows... the bike rides well and im very pleased with the results
WOW, sounds just like me. I only have 310 miles on my bike and only go between 35 and 40 MPH staying between 4K and 6K revs because of my living area. I hope I am not damaging the engine.I have an FZ6RAC and have been doing it by the book. As hard as it is i keep my revs less than 6 and never hold them their for long. It seems like the bike really wants to go around that range, and shifts better. I do go on bout a 25-30 mile rides about once or twice a day(IF THE BALL AND CHAIN LETS ME OUT TO PLAY) and i will keep the revs moving from about 4.5 to six, is that a good way to break in a new bike?